Level 1 comment
Mark,
This seems very promising and I will be interested in the details. I have explored many avenues and they have all ended with being quite finite or demanding blind faith. This seems to be a more open-ended effort. That will be welcome.
I like the structure and the fact that it has room for individuality while providing the basic tools and general approaches. I have long since realized that no-one can provide a permanent rule for others to follow without eventual failure. Your example and analogy approach is the one that takes a baby from birth to the opportunity to use symbolic reasoning and seems to provide a plan to transcend that with guide-posts such as creativity and satisfaction as the second-level metrics.
Just as the trial-and-error path of civilization learned to make a bicycle and then learned to ride it. It soon devised a way to add peddles to power it. Then came automobiles, airplanes and rockets while we developed computers to handle the repetitive decisions, increased the drive power beyond what peddles could provide and let our thoughts carry us forward. It seems to be a long journey but it must begin with a single step.
Since you ask for a question, I submit the first one that comes to mind: is this a team concept or an association of individuals?
